Navy Seals banned from wearing “blackface”? Fact Check

A story that claims Navy Seals are no longer to wear “blackface” is circulating social media.

FALSE

Blackface refers to the act of painting ones face entirely black, often for fancy dress events or sometimes it has an association with sporting events. It is regarding by some as controversial and racially insensitive.

Of course, those in the Navy Seals often adorn black or green face paint for the purposes of camouflage.


Sponsored Content. Continued below...




This particular story actually leads back to a website called duffelblog.com, which isn’t a serious website. It publishes satirical content. An excerpt from the article – which claims that soldiers will be required to wear “inclusive rainbow patterns” instead of black face paint, can be read below.

“We are not 100 percent woke, but this is a big step,” said Lt. Gen. Scott Howell, the current nominee to head Joint Special Operations Command. “We must stop perpetuating the stereotype that all black people are good at tactical operations.”
Recent studies show “blending in with the dark of night” to be a racist artifact of the past. SEALs will now be required to use inclusive rainbow patterns and biodegradable glitter.
“I never felt like I was being racist,” said Petty Officer 1st Class James Largo, “but I understand how cultural biases can find concealment in the covert corners of your mind.”

It seems likely that many Internet users haven’t actually read the article, or noticed the disclaimer link that explains that the website is a parody website.

Duffel Blog is a parody of a news organization, and all content it publishes is satirical in nature. No content should be regarded as truthful, and no reference of an individual, company, or military unit seeks to inflict malice or emotional harm. All characters, groups, and military units appearing in these works are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, or actual military units and companies is purely coincidental.

As is often the case, many readers glanced at the outrage-inducing headline, and shared it without any critical examination. Upon a proper read, it is clearly an article not intended for serious consumption.

Continued below...


Thanks for reading, we hope this article helped, but before you leave us for greener pastures, please help us out.

We're hoping to be totally ad-free by 2025 - after all, no one likes online adverts, and all they do is get in the way and slow everything down. But of course we still have fees and costs to pay, so please, please consider becoming a Facebook supporter! It costs only 0.99p (~$1.30) a month (you can stop at any time) and ensures we can still keep posting Cybersecurity themed content to help keep our communities safe and scam-free. You can subscribe here


Remember, we're active on social media - so follow us on Facebook, Bluesky, Instagram and X